Pismo Birmingham Jail Martin Luther King Jr.

Transcendentalizem

Ogled Dejavnosti

Teme

Ogled Dejavnosti

Literarni Elementi

Ogled Dejavnosti

Ethos, Pathos, Logos

Ogled Dejavnosti

Slovar

Ogled Dejavnosti

A Quick Synopsis of "Letter from Birmingham Jail"

Eight clergy leaders from the city of Birmingham, Alabama wrote an open letter to Martin Luther King, Jr. criticizing King’s role in the nonviolent protests of the Birmingham Campaign which began on April 3, 1963. King was arrested on April 12th, and while in the jail, he penned his harsh, but wisely-worded response to the clergymen’s dissent. The clergymen argued for patience for disputes and issues to be decided in the courts, and that protests were a disruption, not a means to an end. They claimed that these protests were “untimely”, and they urged the “Negro community” to practice restraint.

Martin Luther King, Jr. was understandably dismayed by the attitude of the clergymen, even though he acknowledges that their intentions came from a good place. He begins the letter by explaining why he has come to Birmingham, by simply stating, “I am in Birmingham because injustice is here.” He feels compelled, like the Apostle Paul, to carry the “gospel” of justice to all corners of the South. One of the most popular quotes from this letter is, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere”, a sentiment that has been echoed throughout popular social movements since.

King lays out the four basic steps of a nonviolent campaign, and then he describes how those steps have been employed in Birmingham so far. These steps include collecting facts, negotiation, self-purification and direct action. The first three steps have failed, so the only option left is direct action. King takes issue with the clergymen’s use of the word “untimely.” He states that for so many years, all he has heard is the word, “Wait.” Unfortunately, that usually turns into, “Never.” King is tired of waiting, because injustice has perpetuated in Birmingham for too long.

Finally, King directly addresses his disappointment with the white moderates and the white church leadership. He knows that they should be the African American community’s greatest ally, yet they tend to stand on the sidelines and not assist in any of the efforts to force a change. He criticizes their commendation of the Birmingham police force for maintaining order when in reality, they had released police dogs and violence onto the African American protesters. He wishes that they had turned their praise onto the demonstrators of Birmingham instead, suggesting further that the clergymen’s priorities in this struggle to eliminate injustice are misplaced.

Essential Questions for "Letter from Birmingham Jail"

1. What responsibility does an individual have when he or she witnesses injustice?
2. Should we rebel against laws that are unjust?
3. What rhetorical strategies does King use that are particularly effective in communicating his primary points?
4. Where do the elements of Transcendental thought appear in King’s letter?

Pogosta vprašanja o pismu iz zapora v Birminghamu

Kaj je spodbudilo Martina Luthra Kinga mlajšega, da je napisal 'Pismo iz birminghamskega zapora'?

Martin Luther King mlajši je bil prisiljen napisati "Pismo iz birminghamskega zapora" kot odgovor na javno izjavo osmih belih duhovnikov iz Alabame, ki so kritizirali kampanjo v Birminghamu, ki jo je vodil King. Duhovniki so proteste, ki so jih orkestrirali King in njegovi sodelavci, obsodili kot "nemodre in nepravočasne" ter pozvali k bolj previdnemu in postopnemu pristopu k reševanju rasnih vprašanj. King, ki je bil zaprt zaradi sodelovanja v teh nenasilnih protestih, je izkoristil priložnost, da je obravnaval te kritike, artikuliral načela in nujnost nenasilnega odpora ter pojasnil, zakaj si gibanje za državljanske pravice ne more več privoščiti čakanja na pravico. Njegovo pismo je zagovarjalo strategijo neposrednega ukrepanja in ostro prošnjo za nujno potrebo po moralnem ukrepanju za soočenje z rasno krivico.

Zakaj je 'Pismo iz birminghamskega zapora' še danes aktualno?

"Pismo iz birminghamskega zapora" je še danes zelo pomembno zaradi svojih trajnih tem pravičnosti, enakosti in pomena nenasilnega protesta. Raziskovanje moralnih odgovornosti posameznikov pred nepravičnimi zakoni v pismu odmeva v sodobnih gibanjih, ki izzivajo sistemske krivice in se zavzemajo za družbene spremembe. Njegova kritika 'belih zmernih' in poziv k bolj neposrednemu in takojšnjemu soočanju s krivico še naprej dajeta informacije o razpravah o državljanskih pravicah in aktivizmu. Načela, ki jih King navaja v pismu, kot sta medsebojna povezanost skupnosti in nujnost boja za pravičnost, presegajo čas in kontekst, zaradi česar je pismo brezčasen manifest za zagovornike socialne pravičnosti in aktiviste za človekove pravice.

S kakšnimi kritikami ali protiargumenti se je soočilo 'Pismo iz birminghamskega zapora'?

Čeprav je "Pismo iz birminghamskega zapora" splošno slavljeno zaradi svoje retorične moči in moralne moči, je v preteklih letih naletelo na nekaj kritik in protiargumentov. Nekateri kritiki trdijo, da je bil Kingov poziv k neposrednemu ukrepanju preveč konflikten in bi lahko izzval nasilje, pri čemer dajejo prednost bolj postopnim, legalističnim pristopom k reformi državljanskih pravic. Drugi so Kinga kritizirali, ker je preveč optimističen glede moralnega loka vesolja, ki se upogiba k pravičnosti, kar kaže na naivnost glede globoko zakoreninjenosti rasizma. Poleg tega nekateri sodobni bralci dvomijo o učinkovitosti nenasilnega odpora ob določenih oblikah zatiranja in zagovarjajo bolj radikalne pristope. Vendar so te kritike na splošno zasenčene zaradi širokega odobravanja pisma in njegove pomembne vloge pri oblikovanju gibanja za državljanske pravice in moralnega diskurza o državljanskih pravicah in socialni pravičnosti.