Search
  • Search
  • My Storyboards

Plessy V. Ferguson

Create a Storyboard
Copy this Storyboard CREATE A STORYBOARD!
Create your own at Storyboard That

White people and Black people were in separate cars and required them to sit separately.

Plessy argues that the 14th Amendment says that the states may not “ deny to any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

He argued that requiring black people to sit separately from white people implied that blacks were inferior to whites, and therefore unequal.

Plessy

The Supreme Court disagreed. It saw separate train cars as an issue of social equality, not political or legal equality. It said separating the races did not take away civil or political rights.

Plessy V. Ferguson

Plessy V. Ferguson was monumental because it essentially established the constitutionality of racial segregation.

Create your own at Storyboard That

White people and Black people were in separate cars and required them to sit separately.

Plessy argues that the 14th Amendment says that the states may not “ deny to any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

He argued that requiring black people to sit separately from white people implied that blacks were inferior to whites, and therefore unequal.

Plessy

The Supreme Court disagreed. It saw separate train cars as an issue of social equality, not political or legal equality. It said separating the races did not take away civil or political rights.

Plessy V. Ferguson

Plessy V. Ferguson was monumental because it essentially established the constitutionality of racial segregation.

Create your own at Storyboard That

White people and Black people were in separate cars and required them to sit separately.

Plessy argues that the 14th Amendment says that the states may not “ deny to any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

He argued that requiring black people to sit separately from white people implied that blacks were inferior to whites, and therefore unequal.

Plessy

The Supreme Court disagreed. It saw separate train cars as an issue of social equality, not political or legal equality. It said separating the races did not take away civil or political rights.

Plessy V. Ferguson

Plessy V. Ferguson was monumental because it essentially established the constitutionality of racial segregation.

Create your own at Storyboard That

White people and Black people were in separate cars and required them to sit separately.

Plessy argues that the 14th Amendment says that the states may not “ deny to any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

He argued that requiring black people to sit separately from white people implied that blacks were inferior to whites, and therefore unequal.

Plessy

The Supreme Court disagreed. It saw separate train cars as an issue of social equality, not political or legal equality. It said separating the races did not take away civil or political rights.

Plessy V. Ferguson

Plessy V. Ferguson was monumental because it essentially established the constitutionality of racial segregation.

Create your own at Storyboard That

White people and Black people were in separate cars and required them to sit separately.

Plessy argues that the 14th Amendment says that the states may not “ deny to any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

He argued that requiring black people to sit separately from white people implied that blacks were inferior to whites, and therefore unequal.

Plessy

The Supreme Court disagreed. It saw separate train cars as an issue of social equality, not political or legal equality. It said separating the races did not take away civil or political rights.

Plessy V. Ferguson

Plessy V. Ferguson was monumental because it essentially established the constitutionality of racial segregation.

Create your own at Storyboard That

White people and Black people were in separate cars and required them to sit separately.

Plessy argues that the 14th Amendment says that the states may not “ deny to any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

He argued that requiring black people to sit separately from white people implied that blacks were inferior to whites, and therefore unequal.

Plessy

The Supreme Court disagreed. It saw separate train cars as an issue of social equality, not political or legal equality. It said separating the races did not take away civil or political rights.

Plessy V. Ferguson

Plessy V. Ferguson was monumental because it essentially established the constitutionality of racial segregation.

Create your own at Storyboard That

White people and Black people were in separate cars and required them to sit separately.

Plessy argues that the 14th Amendment says that the states may not “ deny to any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

He argued that requiring black people to sit separately from white people implied that blacks were inferior to whites, and therefore unequal.

Plessy

The Supreme Court disagreed. It saw separate train cars as an issue of social equality, not political or legal equality. It said separating the races did not take away civil or political rights.

Plessy V. Ferguson

Plessy V. Ferguson was monumental because it essentially established the constitutionality of racial segregation.

Create your own at Storyboard That

White people and Black people were in separate cars and required them to sit separately.

Plessy argues that the 14th Amendment says that the states may not “ deny to any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

He argued that requiring black people to sit separately from white people implied that blacks were inferior to whites, and therefore unequal.

Plessy

The Supreme Court disagreed. It saw separate train cars as an issue of social equality, not political or legal equality. It said separating the races did not take away civil or political rights.

Plessy V. Ferguson

Plessy V. Ferguson was monumental because it essentially established the constitutionality of racial segregation.

View as slideshow
CREATE A STORYBOARD! Copy
Storyboard That Characters Storyboard That

Create your own Storyboard

Try it for Free!

Create your own Storyboard

Try it for Free!

Storyboard Text

  • White people and Black people were in separate cars and required them to sit separately.
  • Plessy
  • Plessy argues that the 14th Amendment says that the states may not “ deny to any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
  • He argued that requiring black people to sit separately from white people implied that blacks were inferior to whites, and therefore unequal.
  • The Supreme Court disagreed. It saw separate train cars as an issue of social equality, not political or legal equality. It said separating the races did not take away civil or political rights.
  • Plessy V. Ferguson
  • Plessy V. Ferguson was monumental because it essentially established the constitutionality of racial segregation.
Over 30 Million Storyboards Created
No Downloads, No Credit Card, and No Login Needed to Try!
CREATE MY FIRST STORYBOARD
Storyboard That Family

We use cookies so you get the best experience, Privacy Policy

Got it!