Iskanje
  • Iskanje
  • Moje Zbirke Zgodb

The Dred Scott Decision

Ustvarite Snemalno Knjigo
Kopirajte to snemalno knjigo
The Dred Scott Decision
Storyboard That

Ustvarite svojo snemalno knjigo

Preizkusite brezplačno!

Ustvarite svojo snemalno knjigo

Preizkusite brezplačno!

Snemalna Knjiga Besedilo

  • Why did Dred say he was "free"?
  • I'm free!
  • Was Dred Scott freed?
  • ?!?!?
  • no
  • Click to Edit Title
  • Dred Scott and his owner traveled with his owner to Wisconsin, where slavery was banned by the Missouri Compromise.
  • Supreme Court
  • You are not a citizen.
  • Taney declared that the Court had rejected Scott's argument that his stay in Wisconsin had made him a free man.
  • Why or why not?
  • vote 7:2
  • Why not??
  • (Northerners)The decision of the moral assassination of a race and cannot be obeyed!
  • Taney reasoned that banning slavery in a territory was the same as taking property from slaveholders who would like to bring their slaves into that territory, which was unconstitutional.
  • Congress had a constitutional responsibility to protect the property rights of slaveholders in a territory.
  • why
  • unconstitutional
  • The Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. By a vote of seven to two, the Court had decided that Scott could not sue for his freedom in a federal court because he was not a citizen.
  • You are not a citizen
  • no African American, whether slave or free, was an American citizen—or could ever become one.
Ustvarjenih več kot 30 milijonov snemalnih knjig