Snemalna Knjiga Besedilo
- Влияет ли на скорость и поток мужского мочеиспускания в общественном туалете вторжение в личное пространство?
- Помощник
- Make sure you stand next to the participant!
- Confederate
- 16 Inches
- Subject
- Middlemist designed an experiemnet to test howspeed and flow of men’s urination in a public lavatory was affected by invasions of personal space
- In the study the researchers sent a confederate to stand next to the real participant by placing a confederate next to the subject or removing a urinal by placing a "don't use" sign on it.
- Based on our research we know that an invasion of personal space affects micturition
- Thismeant that the two people in thebathroom (confederate andsubject) would be forced to be approximately 16-18 inches apart
- Ethical Issues
- Justification
- Participants were not fully informed of the observation so could not provide informed consentparticipants were not debriefed after the observation
- To collect the data of time and persistence of micturition, an observer was stationed in a stall. The observer used a periscopic prism imbedded in a stack of books lying on the floor of the toilet stall to view the user's lower torso and made possible a direct visual sightings of the stream of urine
- They found the presence of a researcher extended the time it took to begin urinating.
- The study did face critasisms for being unethical
- Researchers would argue if participants were fully aware of the observation it would lead to unnatural behaviour (demand characteristics)
Ustvarjenih več kot 30 milijonov snemalnih knjig
Brez Prenosov, Brez Kreditne Kartice in Brez Prijave!
