Unknown Story
Storyboard Text
- Mapp vs. Ohio
- Background Information
- Argument
- Warrant
- June 19, 1961
- Supreme Court Ruling
- The case originally took place in Cleveland, Ohio. Police officers forced their way into Dollree Mapp's house without a proper search warrant. The Police searched the house because they believed that Mapp was hiding a suspected bomber. The Police did not find the suspect but found pornographic photos in her basement, so they arrested her.
- Connected Amendment
- United States Constitution
- Mapp was a woman without any record from the criminal point of view. The Police officers claimed that there was something suspicious going on in the house. They had a warrant, but Mapp never got to read it and see if it was a proper warrant. The warrant was not proper. This went against the fourth amendment protection of unlawful searches and seizures.
- Impact
- The United States Supreme Court ruled in a 5-3 vote in favor of Mapp. They said evidence was seized unlawfully, without a search warrant. Mapp was found guilty for lewd books, pictures, and photographs. This is in violation of 2905.34 of Ohio's Revised Code. She was sentenced to seven years in prison.
- This case is connected to the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment is the protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.
- The impact of this case was it strengthened the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, making it illegal for evidence obtained without a warrant to be used in a criminal trial in state court. It also was a landmark decision because the Supreme Court decided that the exclusionary rule not only applied to the United States Federal Government, but also to the United States.
Peste 30 de milioane de Storyboard-uri create