hexagon>square
Siužetinės Linijos Tekstas
- Hey… on this chess board… is a diagonal one or two spaces?
- Well then how do you solve that? With another shape?
- It’s the square root of two spaces… and it corrupts the meaning of space, because if you start in one corner on a chess board and go straight to all the other ones with a straight line, the opposite corner will not make it there in the same amount of tiles. Gross!
- Yes.
- Well then how do you solve that? With another shape?
- What shape?
- The hexagon, because it has 6 “true” neighbors, unlike the square who has 4 “true” neighbors and 4 “fake” ones. 6>4 therefore the hexagon is better, because, like I said earlier, it doesn't corrupt the laws of the universe..
- Yes.
- Bruh why do you care so much about this?
- HMMMMM…. I wonder who wins…
- Shut up. For a very long time there has been massive arguments and bickering over which is better for game boards—
- the hexagon, or the square. The hexagon is better for the reasons I mentioned earlier, but also for many others that I don’t feel like explaining. Square seems simple and good at first, but usually anything that is the first thing you think of, and is easy to implement, is never good.
- Why not?
- But how would we implement this into chess?
- Because they’re terrible, inefficient, and cause spacial and existential suffering.
- Anything could work with extensive thought and effort.
- hmm
- hmm
Sukurta daugiau nei 30 milijonų siužetinių lentelių