Unknown Story
Storyboard Tekst
- Guico goes to LTFRB to apply for CTC.
- i am here to apply for certificate of public convenience for bus service operation.
- LTFRB
- ok. But we cannot include the Aparri-Manila line you applied for.
- Later on Buan also applied for additional trips and file an opposition on Guico;s application
- I am also here to apply for additional trips for Estate of Folerencio Buan, and i would like to oppose Guico's application.
- SUPREME COURT DECISION :
- The application of Buan and Guico was opposed by many transportation companies including Manila Railroad Company and Pangasinan Transportation Company
- We also oppose the application of Guico and Buan.
- By agreement of the both parties, the application was heard in joint hearing.
- i authorized on some trips to be given to Mr. Buan
- Not satisfied with the commission's decision, guco filed a petition for review.
- SUPREME COURT
- It may be true, as claimed, that respondent has no certificate of public convenience exclusively for the line Vigan-Manila alone. However, there is no disputing the fact that respondent has a certificate for the line Aparri-Manila via Claveria and Vigan, and protection of this should extend to all of its parts, Respondent's right to protection as an established operator on the lines applied for is not to be defeated by mere priority in the filing of the application of the newcomer.Petitioner is not necessarily entitled to preference just because, as he alleges, it was his evidence, rather than respondent's, that established the fact that there was still need for additional service. Whose evidence it was that proved such need is not important. What is important is whose operation would best subserve the public interests. On that score we find no sufficient justification for not respecting the opinion of the Commission that the additional service in this case could best be operated by the respondent.
- SUPREME COURT
Izrađeno više od 30 milijuna scenarija