Con Law
Kuvakäsikirjoitus Teksti
- Young v. United States Parcel Service Inc. (UPS)
- Good morning! I would like to request a leave of absence, as I am going to undergo in vitro fertilization. 
- Sure! See you soon!
- Woohoo! I'm pregnant! I can go to work, but I need to make sure I do not lift more than 20 pounds.
- I am back and in treatment, I am just now allowed to lift more than 20 pounds, per the doctor.
- But... that's not fair? I am taking this to court!
- Oh no, that does not work.  Since you used all of your paid time, you're going to be forced to take an unpaid leave, oh, and you'll loose your medical coverage.
- Your Honor, this is unconstitutional! The Pregnancy Discrimination Act requires an employer to provide the same work accommodations to an employee with pregnancy-related work limitations as to employees with similar, but non-pregnancy related, work limitations. 
- The Supreme Court
- With the closing of this case, the court rules in favor of Young in a 6-3 decision. As a result, pregnant women will now be able to be given equivalent treatment compared to others with physical limitations at work, and therefore, will not lose their benefits. Court adjourned.
Yli 30 miljoonaa kuvakäsikirjoitusta luotu